Journal article 7 views
Benefits of public engagement in research and barriers to participation: a UK‐based survey of academic scientists and support staff including international respondents
CHIOMA OGBUKAGU,
Matthias Eberl 
,
Natalie Joseph‐Williams ,
Sarah Hatch ,
Jon Tyrrell
,
Natalie Joseph‐Williams ,
Sarah Hatch ,
Jon Tyrrell
Immunology & Cell Biology
Swansea University Authors:
CHIOMA OGBUKAGU, Jon Tyrrell
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1111/imcb.70079
Abstract
Public engagement is increasingly central to research, especially in biomedical fields, fostering dialogue between scientists and society, building trust and ensuring real‐world relevance. However, as scientific and clinical progress accelerates, the gap between researchers and the public continues...
| Published in: | Immunology & Cell Biology |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0818-9641 1440-1711 |
| Published: |
Wiley
2026
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa71250 |
| Abstract: |
Public engagement is increasingly central to research, especially in biomedical fields, fostering dialogue between scientists and society, building trust and ensuring real‐world relevance. However, as scientific and clinical progress accelerates, the gap between researchers and the public continues to widen, underscoring the need for deeper, more meaningful engagement. Despite the acknowledged value of public engagement for both researchers and the public, we know relatively little about academics' views on opportunities and potential barriers to participation. Using questionnaires and interviews, this study captured insights from 99 researchers and professionals across academic disciplines, career stages and geographical and cultural contexts. Respondents consistently regarded public engagement as an important and rewarding aspect of research, teaching and institutional responsibilities, with the potential to enhance public understanding, acceptance and societal impact. However, enthusiasm was tempered by persistent barriers, including academic workloads, inadequate resources and support, and a lack of formal recognition within career progression. Respondents emphasized the need for systemic reforms to enable greater participation, including tailored training, sustained funding and institutional frameworks that acknowledge and reward engagement. Overall, the findings demonstrate that while motivation for public engagement is widespread, structural and systemic challenges limit its full potential. Addressing these barriers requires coordinated action from universities, funders and policymakers to establish and embed public engagement more consistently as an integral component of academic research and higher education. |
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
patient and public involvement, public engagement in research, responsible research and innovation, science communication |
| College: |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| Funders: |
This project was supported by the MSc in Biomedical Science programme at Swansea University (C.M.O. and J.M.T.). |